Follow-up computed tomography scan in post-COVID-19 pneumonia.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic can be a severe illness that leads to morbidity and mortality. With the increasing number of COVID-19 pneumonia survivors, several long-term changes may persist, including abnormal imaging of lung parenchyma. In addition to the clinical course, it is vital to follow up on pulmonary imaging during the post-infectious period, which is not routinely required in other common pulmonary diagnoses. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest is an effective and diagnostic tool for pneumonia which gives an insight into structural abnormalities within the lungs, complications, and possible progression of the disease. Several studies have monitored COVID-19 pneumonia and its complications using serial CT chest imaging from the initial phase of infection, hospitalization, and post-discharge. Nonetheless, long-term follow-up imaging data in post-COVID-19 is still limited. We have summarized the findings utilizing a systematic review of the literature regarding COVID-19 pneumonia imaging, including long-term follow-up.

Role of proning and positive end-expiratory pressure in COVID-19.

The novel coronavirus, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in early 2020 has brought with itself major morbidity and mortality. It has increased hospital occupancy, heralded economic turmoil, and the rapid transmission and community spread have added to the burden of the virus. Most of the patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxic respiratory failure often secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Based on the limited data available, there have been different opinions about the respiratory mechanics of the ARDS caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our article provides an insight into COVID-19 pathophysiology and how it differs from typical ARDS. Based on these differences, our article explains the different approach to ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS compared to typical ARDS. We critically analyze the role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and proning in the ICU patients. Through the limited data and clinical experience are available, we believe that early proning in COVID-19 patients improves oxygenation and optimal PEEP should be titrated based on individual lung compliance.

Comparison of first and second waves of COVID-19 through severity markers in ICU patients of a developing country.

Background: Many countries are experiencing outbreaks of the second wave of COVID-19 infection. With these outbreaks, the severity of the disease is still ambiguously projected. Certain inflammatory markers are known to be associated with the severity of the disease and regular monitoring of these biomarkers in intensive care unit admissions is paramount to improve clinical outcomes.Objectives: This study was aimed to compare the severity markers of the patients infected during the first wave versus the second wave in an intensive care unit.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study obtaining patient's data from hospital records, admitted during the first wave in March-May 2020, and compared the data with those COVID-19 patients admitted during the second wave from October-November 2020. A descriptive comparison was done among the patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) during both waves of the pandemic.Results: 92 patients from first wave and 68 patients from second wave were included in the analysis, all admitted to ICU with equal gender distribution. Increased age and length of ICU stay was observed during the first wave. BMI, in-hospital mortality and invasive ventilation were statistically indifferent between both the waves. There was significantly higher APACHE-II during first wave (p = 0.007), but SOFA at day 1 (p = 0.213) and day 7 of ICU stay remain indifferent (p = 0.119). Inflammatory markers were less severe during second wave while only neutrophils and lymphocytes were found to peak higher.Conclusion: Most of the severity markers were less intense during the early analysis of second wave.

Stethoscope - An essential diagnostic tool or a relic of the past?

Rene Laennec came up with the idea of a stethoscope in 1816 to avoid the embarrassment of performing immediate auscultation on women. Soon many doctors around the world started using this tool because of its increased accuracy and ease of use. Stethoscopes hold great significance in the medical community. However, is the importance placed on stethoscopes justified today? We now have devices like portable ultrasound machines that make it much easier to visualize the body. These devices offset their higher initial cost by reducing downstream costs due to their greater accuracy and their capability of detecting diseases at an earlier stage. Also, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, new ways are being investigated to reduce the transmission of diseases. Stethoscopes being a possible vector for infectious agents coupled with the advent of newer devices that can visualize the body with greater accuracy put into question the continued use of stethoscopes today. With that said, the use of stethoscopes to diagnose diseases is still crucial in places where buying these new devices is not yet possible. The stethoscope is a great symbol of medicine, but its use needs to be in line with what is best for the patient.

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in COVID-19: A review of literature.

A novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a progressive viral disease that affected people around the world with widespread morbidity and mortality. Patients with COVID-19 infection typically had pulmonary manifestation but can also present with gastrointestinal, cardiac, or neurological system dysfunction. Chest imaging in patients with COVID-19 commonly show bilateral lung involvement with bilateral ground-glass opacity and consolidation. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy can be found due to infectious or non-infectious etiologies. It is commonly found to be associated with malignant diseases, sarcoidosis, and heart failure. Mediastinal lymph node enlargement is not a typical computer tomography of the chest finding of patients with COVID-19 infection. We summarized the literature which suggested or investigated the mediastinal lymph node enlargement in patients with COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed to better characterize the importance of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with COVID-19 infection.